RTI applicant is a consumer, Hon'ble Court (DCF) Click to View

Click Here To Download RTI Performa A In Word Document
Rules By Punjab Govt. (Quantum of fees can be demanded with in 10 days(rule 4(4)) etc..) Click to View

RTI Activist Ram Chander Goyal, Distt. Bhatinda, Punjab demanded information regarding dues sewerage, water, House tax of Property and Mr Goyal's friend demanded information regarding illegal encroachment on Govt. land relating to Respected Ramesh Kumar Mattu (M.C.) from Municipal Committee Goniana under Right to Information Act 2005, afterthat attacked by encroachmenters on Mr Goyal then FIR lodged on dt : 27.Feb.2012 (View FIR). Now RC Goyal demands police protection/security which was not given.

1. Receive Information relating to private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any law for the time being in force
   Click here to View Dated : 07.Nov.2008 (SICP)
    
2. Click here to view Dated : 02.08.2007 (CIC)

Section - 2(h)(d)
Public Utility service providers are under RTI Act, So gas Agencies should come under RTI Act Click here to view

Section - 2(h)(d)(ii)
Non-Government Organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government Click here to view Dated : 26.02.2010 (SICP)

1. Matter is sub-judice should not discourage  citizen from seeking information to prove his or her innocence.
   Click here to View CIC - Dated : 10.April.2007
    
2. Information Seeker should not apply as secretary or president etc. of organization
   See : CC-109/2009 dt : 31.03.2009 of State Information commission Punjab.
   Click to View
    
3. Association would not come under the definition of citizens KIC 72 APL 06

• Sec 4(1)(a)
  Indane said that list of gas agency's all consumers names, consumer numbers and address in CD not separated from our software but when CIC Delhi Ordered then Indane provided the above said information in CD  -  Click to View
  
  
• Not Acceptable Bland Submission by the PIO ("Record is Not Available"),
  So Responsibility Fixed for loss of Records.....
  Click here to View Dated : 08.July.2008 and 27.08.2008
  
• Respondent is directed to supply legible copy of the information asked for,
  Further DFSC is directed to direct his staff to maintain all receipt & dispatch register as per rules because More Than One letter (with the Addition of "A") are kept Under Same serial no. by DFSC Office Bathinda
  Click here to View Dated : 20.Nov.2008  
  
  Sec 4(1)(b)(xiii)
• To Control malpractices by Gas Agency then Consumer can ask for list of consumers held by LPG Distributors Click here

1. Nomination of an officer to act as the PIO at Bharat Petroleum Corporation Bathinda
   Click to View
    
2. Nomination of an Officer who should act as an APIO in the Bhathinda region
   Click to View

1. Appellant compensated with Rs.2500/- because respondent has not acted as per clause 6(3) of the RTI Act 2005. Compensation Rs. 2500/- given through DD Dated 13.07.2009 to Appellant. View DD
   View order (in Word File) Dated : 12.June.2009 of Hon'ble SICP

1. Even after receiving amount, the information was not given by authority to the complainant within 30 days, So SICP ordered to refund the amount Rs.100/-
   Click here to View 30.April.2010

2. Public Authority must give full information Attested and
   As per provisions of sec 7 (6) "the information shall be provided free of charge where a public authority fails to comply with the time limits specified in sub section 1" (30 Days)
   Click here to View order of SICP  Dated : 08.July.2008
    
3. DFSC Bathinda was tantamount to his compelling the complainant to go to his office, which is not permissible under the RTI Act. 
   Click here to View order of SICP  
    
4. Regarding Wrong Heading / Address on Indian Postal Order (IPO's)
    Click here to View order of SICP  
    

Shri Balvir Singh Saini (complainant) states that he wants coloured photo copies of the information supplied to him.
Decision no . CC No. 1286/07.08.2008 SICP Click Here To View

19(8)a(ii)  Nomination of an officer to act as the PIO at Bharat Petroleum Corporation Bathinda
Click to View

1. On Receiving Notice from State Information Commission Punjab, Public Information officer delivered Information Quickly, But  complainant go to SICP -Chandigarh again and again for insisting compensation and penalty for Delay.
   State Information Commission Punjab imposed penalty of Rs.5000/-
   Click to View - 10.Feb.2009

1. The University authorities erred in asking for a fee of Rs.10,000/- or in prescribing a time limit of three weeks for seeking the information. Under the Right to Information Act, 2005 no time limit has been prescribed and fee is to be charged in accordance with the Punjab Right to Information Rules, 2007 as notified by the State Government vide G.S.R.16/C.A.22/2005/S.27/2007.
   The appellant has relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in 2011(3) RCR-Civil 914 (Central Board of Secondary Education vs. Adityabadopdaya and others)
   Click to View - AC No. 1038 of 2011 - dt : 30.Dec.2011

1. Nomination of an Officer who should act as an APIO in the Bhathinda region
   Click to View